易坊好文馆

  1. 首页 > 生活百科 >

2020GRE写作从零开始入门必备基础知识

GRE写作考试备考初期，如何分配GRE写作考试时间等有关GRE写作考试方方面面的知识是每个考生都需要了解和熟悉的基本常识，下面小编就和大家分享GRE写作从零开始入门必备基础知识讲解，来欣赏一下吧 。
GRE写作从零开始入门必备基础知识讲解
新GRE写作要求考生在30分钟 30分钟内分别完成两篇文章，它是美国所有作文考试中时间最长而质量要求最高的一类作文考试 。
新GRE写作考试具体内容
新GRE考试写作包括两个不同的部分：
1. Issue task(30min)，要求作者根据所给题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文 。
2.Argument task(30min)，要求考生分析所给题目，完成一篇驳论文，指出并且有力的驳斥题目中的主要逻辑错误 。
GRE写作的记分方式
GRE写作记分方式是这样的，两篇作文总分都是六分，计算公式为你的得分=(Issue的得分Argument的得分)/2，最终的计分是以0.5分为一个格 。
新GRE写作考试两部分难度分析
难度： Issue>Argument
总的来看，Issue难度高于Argument 。对于考生来说，Issue比Argument要求拥有更扎实的写作功底和更严密的逻辑思维 。同时，ETS对于Issue的模板化和plagiarisms更加敏感 。总之，获得Issue高分需要较多的努力 。相比之下，Argument内容相对单一(出错的逻辑类型比较少)，题目中给了考生更多的提示信息，因此提高Argument成绩容易一些 。
GRE写作高分范文：想法付诸行动的困难性
【2020GRE写作从零开始入门必备基础知识】It is easy to welcome innovation and accept new ideas. What most peoplefind difficult, however, is accepting the way these new ideas are put intopractice.
拥护革新和接受新想法很简单 。但是在大多数人们看来，最困难的是接受把这些新想法付诸实现的方式 。
GRE写作范文：：
The writer of the issue connotates an ironic phenomenon: though innovationis required in our era and eulogized by most people, application of it isclannished vehemently because of the fear of failure and the possibility ofobtained possession and tradition impairing. The author grasps the paradoxpsychology of most people and pertinently reveals a universal mentality.
As is known that innovation may bring big progress and result in even arevolutionary transition of a society: the elevated efficiency of work, theameliorated life, the enticing fruit of new technology and so on. Following withinnovation of the second industrial revolution, great changes took place andimmediately a renewed world unfolded before us with the application of itsfruits. Seeing unimaginable profits and the magic power, who (including thesociety and government) can suppress their agitating desire to restrictdevelopment of innovation?
Unfortunately, innovation doesn't always follow the people's will andalways acts like an uncontroled horse running in the plain. Worrying about theside-effect, people have to hold their desire back but admire those who arebrave enough to taste crabs for the first time. Not everyone possesses the samecourage as Biil Gate's, who dare invest on a fresh field and give up the chanceof studying in Harvard University, which is the dream of most aggressive youngpeople. Often, pondering what they have already possessed with what they mightget from innovation, most people prefer the former to the latter, even contentto sacrifice the latter to ensure the integer of the former. For example, adepartment may enroll those who are not very deft in the work but behavecomplaisant before higher-ups and deny to those who stick to their innovationalopinion obstinately. After all, it is required more to cooperate with othersharmoniously and conform to the traditional rules nowadays than to creat a newlaw according to individual penchant, in any company and corporation.
Maybe, some one argues that, how to cultivate innovation if personalityshould abdicate to interests of collective? Does the statement above alludesthat employees should do nothing but keep silent and follow what the higher-upsdictated, strangling their inspiration to accord to the criterion today? Nodoubt, such supposition is rediculous. I mean that employees should try toapproach their original though to tenet of the collective, not attempt todisobey the existed norm, respect suggestion and supposition of others andcircumspect the innovation and then discuss with all the members in the company.That is, responsibility should be taken before the innovation is applied topractice.
Of course, many people don't have the ability that controling theircompulsion of carrying their innovation into application. It doesn't lack ofpeople who dare not apply innovation, and people who hold innovational thoughtare not scarc either, however,those who possess both of the two abilities andare lucky enough to encounter a proper opportunity to release their innovationis very few. The seperation of spirit of application and creation of innovationis the root of the the strange phenomenon, that innovation and new ideas arehere and there while the acceptance and combination of them with application istoo little to be heard.
GRE写作高分范文：批判性思维
GRE写作范文：
Too much time, money, and energy are spent developing new and moreelaborate technology. Society should instead focus on maximizing the use ofexisting technology for the immediate benefit of its citizens.
I must say that I reject this statement. While it is true that we need tosupport society as much as possible with current technology, that does not inany way mean that we should stop progressing simply because our currenttechnology cannot handle all the problems we have brought to it. Does that meanthat we should simply accept the status quo and make do? No, I don’t think so.To do so would be tantamount to adopting a fatalistic approach; I think mostpeople would reject that.
Technology has helped, and it has hurt. Without it, we would never have ourstandard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectation of a long andproductive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives can be made evenbetter. But it has also brought us universal pollution, weapons so powerful asto be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequent fear for our survivalas species and as a planet. Technology is indeed a double-edged sword. And yet,I still have to argue in its favor, because without it, we have no hope.
Some might argue that we would be better off without technology. They mightsay that a return to a less technologically driven approach to life would havethe benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler, happier lives,like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so much so that much ofart and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. But upon closer inspection, onerealizes that such a move would only return us to a life of different kinds ofstress, one of false simplicity, one fraught with danger. It would be a life
without antibiotics where a minor cut could prove deadly. It would be alife where childbirth is the main killer of women, and where an emergency isdealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutes and hours; a life wherethere are no phones or cars or planes or central heating, no proven drugtherapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Would this world really makepeople happy?
What we already have, we have. And since the only way to move is forward,instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear and worry, we need tolearn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how to deal with a worldthat feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these things means having tomove away from technology into a more difficult realm, that of diplomacy andcompromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger and better and I havemore toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that. But, advanced asit is, it is still in its infancy. We have to allow it to grow up and mature inorder to reap the real rewards that it can bring. And there are even greaterrewards ahead of us than what the world has already experienced. When technologyis pushed to the outer edge, that is where serendipitous discoveries can occur.This has been seen throughout technological advancement, but the easiest exampleis probably the space program which made us think, really hard, about how to dothings in a different environment. It gave us telecommunications, new fabricsand international cooperation. Paramedical devices, so that people can betreated even as they are being transported to the hosptal, are a directdevelopment of that technology. None of this would have happened in the timeframe that it did if we had not pushed for technological advancement. If we haddecided to
第二段：
(概述科技的两面性)Technology has helped, and it has hurt. (具体讨论科技的贡献)Without it, wewould never have our standard of living, nor quality of nutrition, expectationof a long and productive life span, and the unshakable belief that our lives canbe made even better. (具体讨论科技的危害)But it has also brought us universal pollution,weapons so powerful as to be capable of rendering us extinct, and the consequentfear for our survival as species and as a planet. Technology is indeed adouble-edged sword. (表明已考虑到科技的危害，但是依然坚持自己立场)And yet, I still have to argue inits favor, because without it, we have no hope.
第三段：
(提出反方的立场)Some might argue that we would be better off without technology.They might say that a return to a less technologically driven approach to lifewould have the benefits of reducing stress and allowing us to live simpler,happier lives, like those of our forebears. Such an idea is seductive, so muchso that much of art and all of nostalgia are devoted to it. (通过具体论据反驳反方的观点)Butupon closer inspection, one realizes that such a move would only return us to alife of different kinds of stress, one of false simplicity, one fraught withdanger. It would be a life without antibiotics where a minor cut could provedeadly. It would be a life where childbirth is the main killer of women, andwhere an emergency is dealt with in terms of hours and days instead of minutesand hours; a life where there are no phones or cars or planes or centralheating, no proven drug therapies to treat mental illness, no computers. Wouldthis world really make people happy?
第四段：
(在第三段驳论的基础上进一步立论)What we already have, we have. And since the only way tomove is forward, instead of allowing ourselves to be paralyzed by fear andworry, we need to learn how to clean up the pollution we have caused, and how todeal with a world that feeds on weapons and mass destruction. Doing these thingsmeans having to move away from technology into a more difficult realm, that ofdiplomacy and compromise: to move from the bully stance of “I am bigger andbetter and I have more toys and so I win” to a place where everyone wins.
第五段：
Technology is the thing that will allow people to do that.(指出支持观点存在的一点不足)But, advanced as it is, it is still in its infancy. (解决方案)We haveto allow it to grow up and mature in order to reap the real rewards that it canbring. And there are even greater rewards ahead of us than what the world hasalready experienced. When technology is pushed to the outer edge, that is whereserendipitous discoveries can occur. This has been seen throughout technologicaladvancement, but the easiest example is probably the space program which made usthink, really hard, about how to do things in a different environment. It gaveus telecommunications, new fabrics and international cooperation. Paramedicaldevices, so that people can be treated even as they are being transported to thehospital, are a direct development of that technology. None of this would havehappened in the time frame that it did if we had not pushed for technologicaladvancement. If we had decided to “focus on maximizing the use of existingtechnology” instead of foolishly reaching for the stars, we would not have madethose discoveries which now are the bedrock of the 21st century.


GRE写作从零开始入门必备基础知识讲解

    推荐阅读


    上一篇：2020GRE写作开头结尾段高分功能句式

    下一篇：河南南部地区有哪些饮酒习俗？